🔗 Share this article

Through a unsigned ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed Texas to implement a revised congressional district plan that could add as many as five new conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 order, issued on Thursday, grants a request by the state to overturn a lower court's ruling that had rejected the new map in November.

Court's Reasoning

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, generating much confusion and upsetting the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in justifying its decision.

The federal court had determined that Texas had probably classified voters by their race – a act known as racial gerrymandering – when it adopted the redistricting plan. It had ordered the state to employ the boundaries drawn after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Stinging Dissent

With a strongly worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's decision. She argued that it undermined the work of the district court, noting that its ruling was crafted by a judge nominated by ex-President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling ensures that Texas's new map, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, without justification, will be grouped in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has stated repeatedly, is a breach of the U.S. Constitution.

National Redistricting Struggle

The court's action comes amid a nationwide fight over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in efforts to reshape the U.S. House map to secure a fragile Republican majority. Ordinarily, map-drawing occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to proceed with a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a series of events among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that might create a number of more Republican-leaning seats. Democratic lawmakers, in response, have responded with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

The Texas top lawyer hailed the High Court's decision. In a release, he said the order defended Texas's prerogative to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes favorable to his party. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he added.

Conversely, Democratic officials criticized the ruling. The Court's approval of this extreme, racially gerrymandered Texas GOP map is profoundly disappointing, said the leader of a major party election organization.

Another leading Democratic leader stated the court had another time damaged its legitimacy by approving a discriminatory map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.