🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – going beyond the winner citywide, but block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become something of a local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while missing the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters favored Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

I had to do that since they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the system every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of votes that came in after that and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world where yesterday went kind of poorly for Mamdani, where Cuomo would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However Mamdani gained half a million supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president last year went for the progressive now. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I figured we might go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to get over half. He has 50.4% but there’s still probably 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus I don’t think certain, but I think probable, and I hope he achieves it because afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He lost any district in any borough. Including Tottenville in the borough, similar to an highly conservative neighborhood. That really surprised me. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on Staten Island who had a high participation. I believe there was significant tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it before Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for the independent. So there existed some opposition. But overall, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran won – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on whether Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored the independent. And also, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises here, but he retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that key figures from the left come from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – people will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I think that each urban center in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – since youth reside there, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.