🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on expanding your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which content appear to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "agentic" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, stating "Every day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers encountered positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it operates in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where the same posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."